Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206582›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Management of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association survey.

Ilaria Meynet, Jarkko Karvonen, Giuseppe Boriani, Diego Penela, Michal Mazurek, Giacomo Mugnai, Rui Providencia, Piotr Futyma, Andreas Metzner, Julian K R Chun and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identifying patients at low risk for atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke: the PAVA score.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cryptogenic stroke in women: impact of insertable cardiac monitoring in the STROKEWISE cohort study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Burden and age-specific trends of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter from 1990 to 2023: a growing challenge among younger and middle-aged adults.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ilaria MeynetDivision of Cardiology, Ospedale di Rivoli, Strada Rivalta 29, 10098, Rivoli (Torino), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-4472
Jarkko KarvonenHelsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0686-2782
Giuseppe BorianiCardiology Division, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9820-4815
Diego PenelaHumanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-7221-4829
Michal Mazurek1st Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, ul. Skłodowskiej Curie 9, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1991-1707
Giacomo MugnaiDivision of Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic Department, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4733-9418
Rui ProvidenciaInstitute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9141-9883
Piotr FutymaMedical College, University of Rzeszów, al. Tadeusza Rejtana 16C, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0219-7612
Andreas MetznerDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6818-6396
Julian K R ChunCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Medizinische Klinik III, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Wilhelm-Epstein-Straße 4, 60431 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2355-6015
Laura PerrottaArrhythmia Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4322-1183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDevice-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation (DDAF) is increasingly documented either with implantable cardiac electronic devices (CIED) or with consumer-based mobile or wearable monitors. We aimed to investigate phisician's reaction to DDAF, which management is still matter of debate.

methodsThis is a physician-based survey with 24 multiple-choice questions.

resultsA total of 222 physicians from 46 countries responded the survey. DDAF is frequent, occurring in >10% of CIEDs follow-up for 37% of respondents. Oral anticoagulation is prescribed according to CHA2DS2-VA and AF duration; 34% of the respondents initiate anticoagulation with AF >24 h, 26% with AF >6 h, and 15% with AF >5-6 min. Respondents from non-European countries and Mediterranean Europe are more likely to prescribe diagnostic exams and therapy than respondents from North Europe. Systematic long-term AF screening with implantable loop recorder (ILR) after cryptogenic stroke ranges from 43 ± 27% of ILR implanted for that purpose in Mediterranean countries to 10 ± 20% in North Europe. The majority of responders recommends the use of consumer-based devices to screen for AF mainly in specific situations (undiagnosed palpitations, ischaemic stroke, or AF burden monitoring) and not routinely, just according to CHA2DS2-VA or age.

conclusionAF screening is not routinely performed, either in primary or secondary prevention of stroke. Device-detected AF is not uncommon and generally managed based on thromboembolic risk and duration of episodes; the cut-offs of AF duration, global burden, and number of episodes are yet to be determined in terms of role and clinical value. Clinicians' approaches to subclinical AF remain heterogeneous.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationDefibrillators, ImplantableElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryPacemaker, ArtificialPractice Patterns, Physicians'StrokeWearable Electronic DevicesAsymptomatic DiseasesEuropeHealth Care SurveysHumansRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationConsumed-based devicesEHRA SurveyImplantable devicesOral anticoagulationScreening

Identifiers

PMID41206582
PMCPMC12677020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.