Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206548›Full record

ArticleBJS open2025

Watch-and-wait approach in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: outcomes after complete response to total neoadjuvant therapy.

Evi Banken, Barbara M Geubels, Fleur E C Vande Kerckhove, Davy M J Creemers, Stijn H J Ketelaers, Joost Nederend, Heike M U Peulen, Irene E G van Hellemond, Harm J T Rutten, Jacobus W A Burger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evi BankenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-6684-0101
Barbara M GeubelsDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Fleur E C Vande KerckhoveDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Davy M J CreemersDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-8444-3865
Stijn H J KetelaersDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Joost NederendDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Heike M U PeulenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Irene E G van HellemondDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Harm J T RuttenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jacobus W A BurgerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 10070012010003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with the most advanced stages of high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), extensive resections often lead to morbidity and functional impairment. It is unclear whether these patients, despite poor prognosis, are suitable candidates for a watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in cases of a clinical complete response (cCR).

methodsConsecutive patients with high-risk LARC who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), followed by surgery or a W&W approach between January 2016 and February 2023, were retrospectively analysed. High-risk features included tumour invasion into the mesorectal fascia, grade 4 extramural venous invasion, enlarged lateral lymph nodes, or tumour deposits. Patients were categorized into complete response (CR) or non-CR, and stratified by W&W and surgically treated. Outcomes were regrowth, local recurrence, distant metastases (DM), regrowth-free survival, organ survival, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (all death-censored), and overall survival.

resultsOf 135 patients, 29 (21.5%) achieved a cCR and entered W&W. A total of 103 patients (78.0%) underwent immediate surgery, including 15 (11.1%) with a pathological CR. Median follow-up was 42 months (range 9-76) for CR patients versus 42.5 months (range 7-82) for non-CR patients. Local recurrence and DM occurred in 1 (2.3%) and 7 patients (15.9%) in the CR group, respectively, versus 14 (15.9%) and 21 patients (23.9%) in the non-CR group, respectively. Three-year death-censored LRFS and DMFS rates were 97.6% and 82.7% in the CR group, respectively, versus 85.8% and 76.0% in the non-CR group, respectively (P = 0.016, P = 0.273). Five-year overall survival was 89.5% in the CR group versus 84.0% in the non-CR group (P = 0.131). Median follow-up was 44 months (range 16-71) in W&W patients and 42 months (range 7-82) in surgically treated patients. Among W&W patients, regrowth occurred in seven patients (24.1%) and the 3-year death-censored regrowth-free survival was 79.2%. Three-year death-censored RFS and 5-year overall survival were 71.9% and 90.9% in W&W patients, respectively, versus 72.3% and 84.2% in surgically treated patients, respectively (P = 0.680, P = 0.115).

conclusionA W&W approach can be considered safe and feasible for patients with high-risk LARC. Achieving a CR after TNT is associated with favourable oncological outcomes.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeinduction chemotherapyorgan preservationradiotherapyrectal cancer managementresponse assessment

Identifiers

PMID41206548
PMCPMC12596363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.