ReviewPlant communications2026
Molecular mechanisms modulating beneficial plant root-microbe interactions: What's common?
Review in Plant communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- Interactions BetweenMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Fungal Communities Within Pitaya Fruit Peel Shift During Ripening and Early Canker Onset.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Soil to Cytoplasm: The Mycorrhizal Phosphorus Express and Its Regulatory Steps.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Mycorrhiza helper bacteria as stage-specific modulators of fungal development.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Mycorrhizal fungi volatiles: determining the fate of plants against stress?Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Engineering Plant-Microbiome Interaction Networks for Predictive Soil Bioremediation Under the Stress-Stability Paradox.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the current context of climate change, there is a need to develop more sustainable agrifood strategies. As an alternative to the intensive use of chemically synthesized fertilizers and pesticides that pollute water and impact biodiversity, there is a growing interest in using beneficial microbes as biostimulants and/or bioprotection agents. However, their implementation in agriculture remains a challenge due to highly variable outcomes and benefits. Furthermore, there are major knowledge gaps about the molecular mechanisms that regulate different plant-microbe interactions. In the present review, we summarize current knowledge on the molecular mechanisms that control different beneficial plant root-microbe interactions; namely, arbuscular mycorrhiza, the rhizobium-legume symbiosis, ectomycorrhiza, and fungal and bacterial endophytic associations. This includes the signaling pathways required for recognition of microbes as beneficial, the metabolic pathways that provide nutritional benefits to the plant, and the regulatory pathways that modulate the extent of symbiosis establishment depending on soil nutrient availability and plant needs. Our aim is to highlight the main common mechanisms, as well as knowledge gaps, in order to promote the use of microbes, either individually or in consortia, within the framework of a sustainable agriculture that is less dependent on chemicals and more protective of biodiversity and water resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.