Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206488›Full record

ArticleSleep2026

Sleep restriction increases reward sensitivity during sequential updating.

Jeryl Y L Lim, Daniel Bennett, Sean P A Drummond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeryl Y L LimSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3806-6630
Daniel BennettSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6608-9026
Sean P A DrummondSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9815-626X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic sleep restriction is a common phenomenon in the real world, yet its impact on how individuals learn and adapt to dynamic patterns of reward in uncertain environments are not well understood. The present study examined how sleep restriction alters the cognitive mechanisms underlying sequential updating, defined as the process by which individuals revise beliefs over time in response to outcome feedback. Thirty-six healthy adults completed two conditions in counterbalanced order: well-rested (seven nights of 9 h time-in-bed) and sleep restriction (seven nights of 5 h time-in-bed). On the final day of each condition, participants performed a probabilistic reversal learning task, requiring flexible behavioral adjustments in response to changing reward contingencies. Computational models grounded in reinforcement learning and Bayesian frameworks were fitted to trial-level data using hierarchical Bayesian estimation. Our model comparison indicated the Asymmetric Rescorla-Wagner model best accounted for behavior, indicating feedback-driven updating with distinct learning rates for reward and nonreward outcomes on the probabilistic reversal learning task. Importantly, sleep restriction increased sensitivity to reward feedback and choice stochasticity, indicating greater reward-chasing behavior and less goal-directed decision making under sleep restriction. Trial accuracy did not differ between conditions. These findings diverge from previous evidence indicating reduced sensitivity toward negative outcomes following short-term sleep restriction, pointing to possible dose-dependent sleep restriction effects and those arising from differences in task requirements. Our findings may have practical implications for decision quality in real-world domains where performance depends on optimal feedback-based updating under uncertain decision environments. Statement of Significance While sleep loss is known to affect decision making, little is understood about how it impacts people's ability to learn from experience over time. In many real-world situations, like financial trading and medical contexts, optimized decisions rely on updating beliefs and strategies based on incoming feedback. In this study, we show after one week of sleep restriction, individuals became more influenced by rewards and demonstrated increased choice randomness. This suggests they were more likely to chase immediate gains but had difficulty sustaining consistent decision strategies. These findings help explain how sleep restriction can undermine learning and flexible decision making when faced with uncertainty, and carry implications for performance and accountability in roles where repeated, high-stakes decisions are required.

Indexed as

Reversal LearningRewardSleep DeprivationAdultBayes TheoremDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBayesiandecision makingreinforcement learningsequential updatingsleep restriction

Identifiers

PMID41206488
PMCPMC13017762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.