ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2025
Strain-level dissection of complex rhizoplane and soil bacterial communities using single-cell genomics and metagenomics.
Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metagenomic Tools as Predictive Approaches to Decipher Soil and Rhizosphere Microbial Communities and Their Functions for Sustainable Agriculture.International journal of genomics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Root exudates shape root-associated microbial communities that differ from those in soil. Notably, specific microorganisms colonize the root surface (rhizoplane) and strongly associate with plants. Although retrieving microbial genomes from soil and root-associated environments remains challenging, single amplified genomes (SAGs) and metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) are essential for studying these microbiomes. This study compared SAGs and MAGs constructed from short-read metagenomes of the same soil samples to clarify their advantages and limitations in soil and root-associated microbiomes, and to deepen insights into microbial dynamics in rhizoplane. We demonstrated that SAGs are better suited than MAGs for expanding the microbial tree of life in soil and rhizoplane environments, due to their greater gene content, broader taxonomic coverage, and higher sequence resolution of quality genomes. Metagenomic analysis provided sufficient coverage in the rhizoplane but was limited in soil. Additionally, integrating SAGs with metagenomic reads enabled strain-level analysis of microbial dynamics in the rhizoplane. Furthermore, SAGs provided insights into plasmid-host associations and dynamics, which MAGs failed to capture. Our study highlights the effectiveness of single-cell genomics in expanding microbial genome catalogues in soil and rhizosphere environments. Integrating high-resolution SAGs with comprehensive rhizoplane metagenomes offers a robust approach to elucidating microbial dynamics around plant roots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.