SynthesisBMC medical genomics2025
Prognostic evaluation of glycolysis markers in hepatocellular carcinoma: insights from meta-analysis and multi-omics approaches.
Synthesis in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enolase 1: A paradigm of metabolic enzyme moonlighting in tumorigenesis (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlycolysis, a central process of cellular energy metabolism, has been shown to be closely associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the glycolysis gene set (GGS) in HCC.
methodsOnline databases were searched to identify studies on the correlation between glycolysis-related gene signature score and clinical characteristics in patients with HCC. HR and OR values with 95% CI were calculated. Bioinformatics analysis and in vitro validation were used to validate the results of the meta-analysis and investigate the potential oncogenic mechanisms of GGS.
resultsNineteen studies involving 3,406 patients were included. The pooled analysis showed that a high glycolysis-related gene signature score was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.59-2.46, P < 0.001), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.54-2.64, P < 0.001), and relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.39-4.08, P = 0.002). Bioinformatic and in vitro experiments confirmed the prognostic relevance and differential expression of GGS in HCC, and functional assays of ENO1 further demonstrated its role in HCC progression.
conclusionThe upregulation of the glycolysis-related gene signature score is predominantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with HCC, suggesting that GGS may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for HCC, as exemplified by ENO1 functional validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.