ReviewDiabetologia2026
Is the NOD mouse a good model for type 1 diabetes?
Review in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Murine and Humanized Mouse Models in Autoimmune Disease Research and Therapeutics Development.Biology · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial Protection by Trifolirhizin Alleviates Primary Sjögren's Syndrome and Liver Injury via Coordinated Suppression of the ROS/cGAS-STING Pathway.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Genetic Landscape of Diabetes Mellitus: Lessons from Monogenic and Polygenic Forms.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The NOD mouse is the best-known, although by no means the only, murine model of type 1 diabetes. In this review, we provide a historical perspective, particularly highlighting areas of progress in understanding aspects of aetiology and immune pathogenesis, and utility in helping to shape the immunotherapeutic landscape. We introduce points of interest where the NOD mouse, a much-studied model, has signposted discovery and knowledge. We discuss genetics, pancreatic islet beta cell stress, innate and adaptive immunity and autoantigens, and also focus on immunotherapeutic agents that have been tested in NOD mice and in humans. Some therapies, particularly those that are non-antigen-specific, have been more effectively signposted, while others, which include antigen-specific therapies, have not. There is an inevitable divergence between mice and humans that illustrates the need to use models appropriately. We suggest how to make use of this and other models effectively in order to maximise information and knowledge, and suggest not dismissing this important resource because of inappropriate comparisons or unrealistic expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.