Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206386›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Toward robust surgical phase recognition via deep ensemble learning.

Flakë Bajraktari, Lina Hauser, Peter P Pott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Flakë BajraktariInstitute of Medical Device Technology, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 9, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany. flake.bajraktari@imt.uni-stuttgart.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9613-105X
Lina HauserInstitute of Medical Device Technology, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 9, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.
Peter P PottInstitute of Medical Device Technology, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 9, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAutomatic recognition of surgical workflows is a complex yet essential task of context-aware systems in the operating room. However, achieving high accuracy in phase recognition remains a challenge due to the complexity of surgical procedures. While recent deep learning models have made significant progress, individual models often exhibit limitations-some may excel at capturing spatial features, while others are better at modeling temporal dependencies or handling class imbalance.

methodsThis study investigates the use of ensemble learning to combine the complementary strengths of diverse architectures, aiming to mitigate individual model weaknesses and improve performance in surgical phase recognition using the Cholec80 dataset. A variety of advanced deep learning architectures was integrated into a single ensemble. Models were carefully selected and tuned to ensure diversity, resulting in a final set of 15 unique ensembles. Ensemble strategies were explored to determine the most effective method for combining the distinct models.

resultsThe results demonstrated that ensemble learning significantly improved performance. Among the ensemble strategies tested, majority voting achieved the highest F1-score, followed by the proposed artificial neural network StackingNet. Ensembles with high model diversity showed superior performance compared to those with lower diversity. The optimal ensemble configuration integrated top-performing models from different architectures, leading to improvements in accuracy, F1-score, and Jaccard Index by 1.48 %, 3.68 %, and 5.43 %, respectively, compared to the best individual models.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that ensemble learning can substantially enhance surgical phase recognition by leveraging the complementary strengths of diverse deep learning models. Ensemble size, diversity, and meta-model selection were identified as key factors influencing performance. The resulting improvements translate into clinically meaningful benefits by enabling more reliable context-aware guidance, reducing misclassifications during critical phases, and improving surgeons' trust in artificial intelligence (AI) systems.

Indexed as

Deep LearningWorkflowEnsemble LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerDeep ensemble learningModel diversityPhase recognitionSurgical assistance

Identifiers

PMID41206386
PMCPMC12929341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.