ReviewThe protein journal2026
Strategic Approaches for Overcoming Peptide and Protein Drug Limitations.
Review in The protein journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peptide-based allosteric modulators of AMPA receptors: design, docking and ligand-receptor interactions.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026Article
- Selective α-Amylase Inhibition by Plant Defensins: Structural Determinants, Engineering Strategies, and Translational Prospects.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Pharmaceutical Peptides: From Synthesis and Mechanistic Pharmacology to Future Biologic Therapeutics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cationic lipid-based nanoparticles for therapeutic delivery in cancer treatment: physicochemical characteristics, therapeutic cargos, and clinical potential.Applied microscopy · 2026Review
- Combined use of methyl gallate and N-acyl homoserine lactonase YtnP to inhibit biofilm formation in Burkholderia thailandensis.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Immunogenicity Management Strategies for PEGylated Drug Delivery Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein and peptide drugs have become essential in treating numerous diseases due to their high specificity and therapeutic potential. However, their clinical application faces several challenges, including chemical instability, physical instability, short in vivo half-life, low oral bioavailability, and immunogenicity. These issues reduce drug efficacy and limit patient compliance. This review critically examines these limitations and presents current strategies to address them. PEGylation, the covalent or noncovalent attachment of polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecules to proteins, is highlighted for its ability to increase stability, reduce renal clearance, lower immunogenicity, and extend half-life. The review distinguishes between random and site-specific PEGylation, highlighting site-specific methods that preserve protein activity while optimizing pharmacokinetics. Additionally, the encapsulation of proteins in polymeric and lipid-based delivery systems is discussed to protect drugs from enzymatic degradation, control their release, and enhance absorption. Biobetter approaches, including site-directed mutagenesis, are also presented to improve protein stability and reduce immunogenicity. Market data and approved drug examples illustrate the impact of these strategies. Overall, the article provides a comprehensive overview of innovative pharmaceutical and biotechnological methods that enhance the clinical performance and market viability of protein therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41206379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.