SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Efficacy and safety of normobaric hyperoxia as an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard of care in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), yet functional outcomes remain suboptimal. Normobaric hyperoxia (NBHO) is a potential neuroprotective strategy. This study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess NBHO as a potential neuroprotective adjunctive to improve outcomes in EVT-treated patients. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science, was performed in February 2025. The inclusion criteria targeted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NBHO and EVT to EVT alone or with sham oxygen therapy. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software. Four RCTs comprising 648 patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation were included in the study. For the primary efficacy endpoint of excellent functional outcome, defined as the number of patients who had a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 1 at 90 days, the overall odds ratio with a subgroup based on the oxygen delivery duration at 2, 4, and 6 h was in favor of the NBHO group compared to the control (OR = 1.66, 95% CI [1.13, 2.45], P = 0.01, I2 = 0%). The subgroup of 4-hour oxygen delivery duration was the only significant subgroup (OR = 1.6, 95% CI [1.01, 2.51], P = 0.04). Safety outcomes showed no significant differences between the NBHO group and the control group across all reported measures. NBHO as an adjunct to EVT appears to be effective and safe. A 4-hour duration was found to be the most effective. Further RCTs are needed to confirm our results and establish the optimal treatment protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.