Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41206220›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Interchromosomal linkage disequilibrium analysis reveals strong indications of sign epistasis in wheat breeding families.

Augusto Tessele, Geoffrey Morris, Eduard Akhunov, Blaine Johnson, Marshall Clinesmith, Addison Carroll Hope, Allan Fritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genomic approaches to build de novo elite breeding gene pools from locally adapted landraces.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Augusto TesseleDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
Geoffrey MorrisDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3067-3359
Eduard AkhunovDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0416-5211
Blaine JohnsonDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, United States.
Marshall ClinesmithDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
Addison Carroll HopeDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.
Allan FritzDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2574-8675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive gene action is assumed to underlie quantitative traits, but the eventual poor performance of elite wheat lines as parents suggests that epistasis could be the underlying genetic architecture. Sign epistasis is characterized by alleles having either a beneficial or detrimental effect depending on the genetic background, which can result in elite lines that fail as parents in certain parental combinations. Hence, the objective of this study was to test the existence of sign epistasis and examine its consequences to wheat breeding. The presence of sign epistasis is expected to distort the allele frequency distribution between 2 interacting genes compared to neutral sites, creating strong linkage disequilibrium (LD). To test this hypothesis, an analysis of interchromosomal LD in breeding families was performed and detected 19 regions in strong disequilibrium, whose allele frequency distribution matched the sign epistasis prediction and falsified the competing hypothesis of additive selection. To validate these candidate interactions while avoiding the biases of a circular analysis and the confounding effects of genetic drift, 2 independent sets of populations were analyzed. Genetic drift was attributed to creating the sign epistasis patterns observed in 11 interactions, but there was not sufficient evidence to reject the sign epistasis hypothesis in 8 interactions. Sign epistasis may explain the poor performance of elite lines as parents, as crossing lines with complementary allelic combination re-establishes epistatic variance in the offspring. Reduction in the effective population size in certain crosses may also occur when unfavorable sign epistatic combinations are deleterious. The potential existence of di-genic and higher-order epistatic interactions in elite germplasm can tremendously impact breeding strategies as managing epistasis becomes imperative for success.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantEpistasis, GeneticLinkage DisequilibriumPlant BreedingTriticumAllelesGene FrequencyGenetic DriftModels, Geneticbreedingepistasisquantitative geneticssign epistasiswheat

Identifiers

PMID41206220
PMCPMC12774603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.