ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Quality of care in an era of global challenges: a transformational vision for WHO European Region and beyond.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Quality Indicators in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review of Contemporary Approaches and Persistent Measurement Gaps.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Health and care workforce planning must move from technical procedures towards governing a complex ecosystem in uncertain times.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Health security needs a European health and care workforce strategy, and it needs it now.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Engaging patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) in patient safety in healthcare organisations: a rapid scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Building public health leadership: design, implementation and outcomes of the WHO European autumn school on quality of care and patient safety.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health systems today face overlapping pressures-from demographic shifts, workforce shortages, climate change, and geopolitical and economic instability. This strains their ability to deliver effective and equitable care and erodes public trust. Traditional approaches to quality of care, often focused on service volumes or process compliance, are proving insufficient to address these system-wide challenges. In response, this paper proposes a transformational vision for quality of care that moves beyond traditional models. This vision is rooted in two interconnected pillars. First, a focus on outcomes that truly matter to people and populations, prioritizing health and well-being over service volume. The second pillar is a whole-systems perspective that embeds quality across all levels of governance, policy, and financing. This transformation is made possible through three key enablers. First, an empowered workforce and accountable leadership are needed to drive change. Second, data must be used transparently to build trust and guide results-focused work. Finally, innovative solutions and tools must enhance quality and be aligned with equity. Drawing on practical implementation examples, this paper outlines a roadmap for system-wide alignment of health systems-to rebuild trust, improve resource use, and advance health equity. This makes quality a lasting foundation for resilient, sustainable, and equitable healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.