ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Artificial intelligence in bioinformatics: a survey.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation probiotics: an outlook into current applications and future developments.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Towards globally equitable bioinformatics adoption.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- The cell-type specific interaction based drug repurposing for psychiatric disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- AI in Drug Discovery: Clinical Failures, Regulatory Reality, and the Validation Crisis Behind the Hype.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative review of artificial intelligence for transcriptomic biomarker discovery in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Toward trustworthy artificial intelligence in multi-omics: a review of reproducibility, stability, and interpretability.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Reindeer: a protein-ligand feature generator software for machine learning algorithms.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Transcriptomics: From Human-in-the-Loop to Agentic AI.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread adoption of high-throughput sequencing technologies and multi-omics approaches has led to rapid accumulation of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and even single-cell multimodal datasets, resulting in an exponential growth of biological data. The massive scale and inherent complexity of these datasets pose significant challenges for data management, analysis, and interpretation in the field of bioinformatics. Concurrently, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly deep learning and reinforcement learning, have achieved groundbreaking advances in medical diagnostics, drug discovery, and genomic analyses, providing novel theoretical tools and analytical paradigms for bioinformatics research. AI techniques are now extensively applied to DNA, RNA, and protein sequence prediction and design, 3D structural elucidation, functional annotation, integrative analysis of multi-omics data, and personalized drug design for precision medicine, significantly advancing biological research. This review systematically summarizes recent research progress and representative applications of AI techniques in bioinformatics, specifically discussing suitable scenarios and advantages of traditional machine learning algorithms, deep learning models, and reinforcement learning methods. We highlight AI's transformative impact with quantitative metrics from landmark achievements: accurate near-atomic protein structure prediction (median 0.96 Å on CASP14), robust single-cell modeling (AvgBIO $\approx $ 0.82), high protein design success rates (up to 92%), and sensitive cancer detection (Area Under Curve (AUC) $\approx $ 0.93). Furthermore, the paper provides an in-depth analysis of the latest advancements of AI in specific tasks, including biomedical text mining, multimodal omics integration, and single-cell analyses, while highlighting current challenges such as data noise and sparsity, difficulties in modeling long biological sequences, complexities in multimodal data integration, insufficient model interpretability, and ethical and privacy concerns. Finally, the paper outlines promising future research directions, emphasizing large-scale data mining, cross-domain model generalization, innovations in drug design and personalized medicine, and advocates for establishing an open and collaborative research ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.