ArticleAge and ageing2025
Towards a global scale for functional ability: what gets measured and gets done-but are we measuring the right thing?
Article in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How to promote healthy ageing among disabled older adults: from a group difference perspective and function-specific pathway models.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional ability-'the health-related attributes that enable people to be and do what they have reason to value'-is the core outcome indicator of the UN Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021-30). Despite its centrality, there is still no globally standardised tool to measure functional ability across five domains defined by WHO: meeting basic needs; learning, growing, and making decisions; mobility; building and maintaining relationships; and contributing to society. Current approaches remain fragmented, limiting efforts to monitor progress and support equitable policy action. This commentary outlines three strategic priorities for addressing this gap. First, a globally validated functional ability scale should be developed, grounded in the WHO's five-domain framework. This effort must begin with clarifying the concept of functional ability-moving beyond narrow biomedical definitions-to ensure conceptual consistency. Early efforts in China and Japan demonstrate the feasibility of operationalising domain-level constructs, though challenges remain in empirical alignment. Second, this scale must be embedded in WHO global ageing population surveysto ensure cross-country comparability and data coverage in high-low- and middle-income contexts. Third, the field must move towards personalised functional ability profiles, reflecting older adults' own values and goals. Innovations in AI and machine learning may support this transition. With only five years remaining in the Decade, finalising and implementing a standardised, person-centred measurement approach is urgent. Doing so would not only advance international monitoring but also help realise the vision of enabling older people everywhere to achieve healthy ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.