ArticleAge and ageing2025
Implementing the world falls guidelines in Sweden: implications for a knowledge support tool and practice.
Article in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the older population grows rapidly, the incidence of falls and fall-related injuries is rising, underscoring the urgent need for systematic, evidence-based fall prevention.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the implementation of the World Falls Guidelines for falls prevention in a region of Sweden, with particular attention to the implications of anchoring and developing a knowledge support tool within policy and practice.
methodsA participatory research design was employed, involving five diverse settings: primary care, hospital care, homecare, municipal social services and pensioners' organizations. Data collection included workshops, field notes and written material. Early implementation processes focused on anchoring and developing, aligning with the i-PARIHS framework. The data were analysed using a framework analysis.
resultsThe anchoring process revealed a lack of managerial support at the appropriate organizational level, which hindered cross-sectoral collaboration. Further, the developing process refined the content structure to better address the needs of both professionals and older adults. Seven themes were mapped by using i-PARIHS framework: (i) Innovation-adoption and adaptation, risk assessment; (ii) Recipients-intermediate managerial decision-making; (iii) Context-collaboration and resources, documentation and information sharing and accessibility and outreach and (iv) Facilitation-project or process.
conclusionSuccessful implementation requires anchoring and organizational alignment across all levels, with particular emphasis on the engagement of intermediate management. While the primary challenges emerge at the organizational (meso) level, they are closely interconnected with both micro-level and macro-level influences. Coordinated efforts across all levels are therefore essential for effective implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.