ReviewEnvironmental research2026
Toxicological impacts of microplastic fibers: A review assessing risk to human and aquatic health.
Review in Environmental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microplastics (particles less than 5 mm in size) are emerging contaminants that are widely distributed in the environment. Among the various morphologies, microplastic fibers (MPFs) are one of the most prevalent in environmental matrices and at multiple levels of biological organization. Most existing literature on the toxicological implications of microplastics on organisms utilizes morphologies that are not commonly recovered from the field (i.e. spheres or beads), therefore limiting our understanding of true toxicological concerns. Thus, this scoping review aimed to summarize and critically discuss the available data on the toxicological impact of MPFs, providing recommendations for future assessments based on the current knowledge gaps in the literature. The novelty of our review lies in identifying similarities across studies to better understand how laboratory approaches can inform toxicological outcomes. Our review found that most of the literature meeting our search criteria focused on work specific to aquatic and mammalian systems, with the latter yielding very few studies. Through the analysis, multiple knowledge gaps in MPF research emerged, such as MPF toxicity can be an artifact of the fiber dimensions (i.e. length or aspect ratio), and that subsequent leaching of additives from fibers may contribute to toxicity. Additionally, we found that there are varying responses to MPFs versus natural fibers, and a limited understanding of the organismal response to MPFs in the presence of other co-contaminants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.