Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41205198›Full record

ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society

Epidemiology and Clinical Impact of Confirmed Respiratory Viral Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Manon L M Prins, Ernst D van Dokkum, Aiko P J de Vries, Maarten E Tushuizen, Danny van der Helm, Edwin M Spithoven, Irene M van der Meer, Eduard M Scholten, Albert M Vollaard, Saskia le Cessie and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Epidemiology and Clinical Impact of Confirmed Respiratory Viral Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Manon L M PrinsLUCID-Subdepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ernst D van DokkumDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Aiko P J de VriesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maarten E TushuizenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Danny van der HelmDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Edwin M SpithovenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Irene M van der MeerDepartment of Nephrology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Eduard M ScholtenDepartment of Nephrology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Albert M VollaardCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Saskia le CessieDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leo G VisserLUCID-Subdepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Geert H GroeneveldLUCID-Subdepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory viral infections (RVIs) can have distinct clinical presentations and outcomes in non-lung solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients compared to non-transplant and lung transplant patients. Understanding their impact is crucial for improving patient care and outcomes.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective study analyzed adult non-lung SOT recipients with PCR-confirmed symptomatic RVIs from eight Dutch hospitals (January 2013-July 2024) to characterize clinical characteristics and outcomes of mono- and co-infections and identify risk factors for intensive care admission or 30-day mortality.

resultsIn total, 603 RVIs were identified in 460 recipients (kidney: 501; liver: 75; pancreas/islet of Langerhans: 4; combined: 23). The most common viruses were SARS-CoV-2 (36%), influenza A/B (29%), rhinovirus (14%), and RSV (7%). Influenza cases showed higher rates of fever (72%), common cold symptoms (37%), and myalgia (29%) than other viruses. Hospitalization occurred in 68% (384/565). Factors independently associated with intensive care admission or 30-day mortality included higher CURB-65 score (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.36-2.70; p < 0.01), radiologic infiltrates (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.60-5.80; p < 0.01), and SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.05-2.67; p = 0.03). In contrast, influenza infection was associated with a lower risk (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.62; p < 0.01). Co-infections were not linked to worse outcomes compared to mono-infections.

conclusionOverall, RVIs in non-lung SOT recipients were associated with high hospitalization and mortality rates. SARS-CoV-2 posed the highest risk for complications, while influenza was associated with a lower risk of severe outcomes. No association was found between co-infection and poor outcomes.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationRespiratory Tract InfectionsTransplant RecipientsVirus DiseasesAdultAgedCoinfectionCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRetrospective Studiesco‐infectionshospital admissionmono‐infectionsmorbidityrespiratory viral infectionssolid organ transplant recipients

Identifiers

PMID41205198
PMCPMC12892827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.