ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Management of Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis: A Global Survey.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and validation of fecal complement component 3 and fibronectin as potential biomarkers for monitoring disease activity in ulcerative colitis based on a mouse model.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimUlcerative proctitis affects approximately 30% of patients with ulcerative colitis. Disease control is essential to maintain quality of life and to prevent disability and disease progression. The aim of this study was to investigate current practice on isolated proctitis management across the globe.
methodsPhysicians with experience in treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) were invited to participate in an anonymous, multiple-choice survey between January and February 2025.
resultsThe survey included 460 physicians from 66 countries. Most participants (87.9%) assessed clinical activity of isolated proctitis within 3 months of treatment initiation, 75.9% used fecal calprotectin, and 67.1% used C-reactive protein to measure disease activity. Endoscopic assessment was performed 3 to 6 months (34.2%) or 6 to 12 months (48.4%) after treatment induction. In this survey, 49% of participants were more reluctant to begin an advanced therapy in patients with isolated proctitis compared to pancolitis or left-sided colitis. About two-thirds of participants were less likely to use biologics in combination with immunosuppressants in isolated proctitis compared to left-sided or pancolitis. Anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) was the preferred choice in first-line advanced therapy after failing conventional treatment (48.4%).
conclusionThis study highlighted differences in management of isolated proctitis compared to left-sided colitis or pancolitis. This is likely explained by the fact that isolated proctitis patients were historically excluded from clinical trials; therefore, management relied on extrapolation of data from studies on more extensive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41205107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.