ArticleFood and environmental virology2025
Comparative Evaluation of Crassphage, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus, and Human Mastadenovirus as Indicators of Human Fecal Contamination in Surface Water.
Article in Food and environmental virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assessed the presence and concentration of crAssphage, pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and human mastadenovirus (HAdV) as potential indicators of human fecal contamination in different aquatic matrices. A total of 75 stream and seawater samples were collected between 2020 and 2021 across four watersheds displaying varying urbanization degrees in Brazil. Viral particles were concentrated employing the adsorption-elution method followed by ultrafiltration and quantified by qPCR/RT-qPCR. The findings indicate that crAssphage was the most frequently detected (65.33%), followed by PMMoV (45.33%) and HAdV (44.00%). CrAssphage also exhibited the highest viral loads in stream water (median of 6.49 log₁₀ GC L⁻¹), reflecting a strong association with domestic sewage. Comparatively, PMMoV showed similar detection rates in both matrices, whereas HAdV exhibited higher detection rates in stream water. Higher crAssphage and PMMoV concentrations were observed in watersheds located in higher population density areas when compared to lower density areas. No viruses were detected upstream of the urbanized regions, confirming the specificity of the selected viral indicators. In this sense, crAssphage and HAdV are more suitable for monitoring stream water bodies affected by human activities, while PMMoV is suited for both matrices. The findings suggest that the three viruses emerged as promising indicators for tracking human fecal contamination in aquatic matrices with different characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41205078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.