Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41205065›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025

Postmortem microbiological sampling: a prospective ESGFOR-supported study on relevance, timing, and site selection.

An Tamsin, Anneleen Claes, Wouter Van Den Bogaert, Birgit Weynand, Amparo Fernandez Rodriguez, Wim Van de Voorde, Veroniek Saegeman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

An TamsinDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium. an.tamsin@azdelta.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7602-3937
Anneleen Claes, Leuven, Belgium.
Wouter Van Den BogaertDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5803-3409
Birgit WeynandTranslational Cell and Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4246-6303
Amparo Fernandez RodriguezEuropean Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) Study Group of Forensic and Post-Mortem Microbiology (ESGFOR), Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2992-3226
Wim Van de VoordeDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-5215
Veroniek SaegemanEuropean Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) Study Group of Forensic and Post-Mortem Microbiology (ESGFOR), Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0439-0205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmortem microbiological tests can help confirm infectious causes of death and identify the responsible microorganism (MO). However, challenges arise due to the lack of consensus and regulatory guidelines. This prospective single-center study conducted at University Hospitals Leuven from 2013 to 2016, aimed to assess the relevance as well as site- and time-related aspects of postmortem microbiology. A total of 200 clinical and forensic autopsies were included in the study, with 1321 samples collected. Approximately one-fifth of cases revealed an infectious cause of death, predominantly pneumonia. Histopathological classification into infectious and non-infectious causes of death served as the gold standard against which microbiological results were compared. The group of MO (i.e., group 1 and group 2 pathogens as well as a small number of specific pathogens), the number of positive sites, specific sampling sites, and the unique presence of a pathogen at a given site were all significantly related to infectious deaths. We propose that the concept of polymicrobial overgrowth as contamination primarily pertains to non-pathogenic MOs. We recommend the sampling of internal or external peripheral blood, heart blood, left lung, and spleen as part of a standardized protocol. Although the postmortem interval (PMI) was shown to affect microbiological results, its clinical relevance warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

AutopsyMicrobiologyPostmortem

Identifiers

PMID41205065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.