ArticleOdontology2026
Influence of root fusion on canal orifice configuration, lateral anatomy, isthmus formation, and apical morphology in maxillary second molars: a micro-CT analysis.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of root fusion on internal root morphology in maxillary second molars by comparing teeth with fused and independent roots using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), in terms of inter-orifice distances, lateral and accessory canal distribution, apical anatomy, isthmus prevalence, and type. Three hundred extracted maxillary second molars were classified as having fused or independent roots and scanned using micro-CT. Linear distances between canal orifices, vertical position of MB2, isthmus types, and canal ramifications were analyzed. ROC analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic utility of inter-orifice distances in predicting root fusion. Statistical comparisons between groups were made using independent samples t-tests and Chi-square tests with a significance threshold of 5%. Fused roots showed significantly shorter MB1-P and DB-P distances compared to independent roots (p < 0.05). Cutoff values of 3.87 mm (MB1-P) and 3.38 mm (DB-P) demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for predicting fusion. The MB1-MB2 distance was not diagnostically useful (AUC < 0.5). Fused roots exhibited more bifid apices and a significantly higher number of apical foramina in mesiobuccal roots (p < 0.05). Independent roots had a higher number of accessory canals, particularly in MB roots. Type IV (isthmus without boundaries) isthmuses were more prevalent in the fused roots (p < 0.05). Fused roots exhibit distinct anatomical features compared to independent roots. Inter-orifice distances involving the palatal orifice may assist in identifying root fusion and anticipating complex canal configurations during endodontic treatment. Inter-orifice distances involving the palatal orifice (MB1-P, DB-P) were shorter in fused maxillary second molars in this ex vivo sample. Fused molars also tend to have more intricate anatomy with more bifid apices, higher mesiobuccal apical foramina counts, fewer accessory canals, and a greater prevalence of Type IV isthmuses compared with independent-rooted counterparts in the examined population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41205025What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.