Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41205023›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026

Maternal and fetal health status assessment by using machine learning on optical 3D body scans.

Ruting Cheng, Yijiang Zheng, Boyuan Feng, Chuhui Qiu, Zhuoxin Long, Joaquin A Calderon, Xiaoke Zhang, Jaclyn M Phillips, James K Hahn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruting ChengDepartment of Computer Science, The George Washington University, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington DC, 20052, USA. rcheng77@gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1442-7166
Yijiang ZhengDepartment of Computer Science, The George Washington University, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington DC, 20052, USA.
Boyuan FengDepartment of Computer Science, The George Washington University, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington DC, 20052, USA.
Chuhui QiuDepartment of Computer Science, The George Washington University, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington DC, 20052, USA.
Zhuoxin LongDepartment of Statistics, The George Washington University, 801 22nd Street NW, Washington DC, 20052, USA.
Joaquin A CalderonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The George Washington University, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC, 20037, USA.
Xiaoke ZhangDepartment of Statistics, The George Washington University, 801 22nd Street NW, Washington DC, 20052, USA.
Jaclyn M PhillipsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The George Washington University, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC, 20037, USA.
James K HahnDepartment of Computer Science, The George Washington University, 800 22nd Street NW, Washington DC, 20052, USA.

Funding

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease R01DK129809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring maternal and fetal health during pregnancy is crucial for preventing adverse outcomes. While tests such as ultrasound scans offer high accuracy, they can be costly and inconvenient. Telehealth solutions and more accessible body shape information provide pregnant women with a convenient way to monitor their health. This study explores the potential of 3D body scan data, captured during the 18-24 gestational weeks, to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes and estimate clinical parameters. We developed a novel algorithm with two parallel streams which are used for extract body shape features: one for supervised learning to extract sequential abdominal level circumference information, and the other for unsupervised learning to extract global shape descriptors, alongside a branch incorporating shape-related demographic data. Our results demonstrated that 3D body shapes can support the prediction of preterm labor and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), as well as the estimation of fetal weight. Compared to other machine learning models, our algorithm achieved the best performance, with prediction accuracies exceeding 89% and fetal weight estimation accuracy of 72.22% within a 10% error margin, outperforming the conventional anthropometric measurements-based method by 18.18%.

Indexed as

FetusImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningMaternal HealthAdultAlgorithmsDiabetes, GestationalFemaleFetal WeightHumansPregnancy3D body scanMachine learningPregnancy outcomesTelehealth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.