Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204996›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Refining mini-monovision with monofocal plus intraocular lenses.

Tadas Naujokaitis, Gerd U Auffarth, Zhiyi Wu, Fátima Cuéllar, Ramin Khoramnia, Grzegorz Łabuz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tadas NaujokaitisDepartment of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Gerd U AuffarthDepartment of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. Gerd.Auffarth@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6927-5251
Zhiyi WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Fátima CuéllarApplied Optics and Image Processing Research Group, Department of Optics and Optometry, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya BarcelonaTech, Violinista Vellsollà 37, 08222, Terrassa, Spain.
Ramin KhoramniaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Grzegorz ŁabuzDepartment of Ophthalmology, The David J. Apple Center for Vision Research, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate simulated mini-monovision with two enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

methodsUsing an optical bench, modulation and phase transfer functions of the Acunex Quantum (Teleon Surgical) and RayOne EMV (Rayner) IOLs with nominal powers of 10D, 20D, and 30D were measured. Simulated visual acuity (simVA) defocus curves were derived. Mini-monovision with an offset of -0.25D to -1.0D was simulated by shifting the simulated defocus curves and by applying quadratic summation to the acquired United States Air Force (USAF) chart images.

resultsThe Acunex Quantum produced a more extended depth of focus than RayOne EMV in simulated defocus curves and USAF chart analysis. Higher-powered lenses tended to provide a slightly greater depth of focus. In a simulated mini-monovision, the − 1.0D myopic offset provided the greatest depth of focus, with a simVA of 0.1 logMAR and better up to approximately − 2.0D to −2.4D with Acunex Quantum and − 1.8D to −2.1D with RayOne EMV. Higher offsets with lower IOL powers resulted in a slightly worse simulated binocular distance vision in the image analysis, more noticeable with the Acunex Quantum, and a slight reduction of binocular simVA between the refractive targets in both IOLs.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that a mini-monovision approach can be successfully applied with either lens: the Acunex Quantum potentially providing a greater depth of focus, and the RayOne EMV a slightly better low-defocus tolerance for lower IOL powers in a non-dominant eye. The differences between the lenses diminished with increasing IOL power.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularLens Implantation, IntraocularOptics and PhotonicsRefraction, OcularVision, MonocularVisual AcuityHumansProsthesis DesignEnhanced monofocalIntraocular lensMini-monovisionMonofocal plusMonovision

Identifiers

PMID41204996
PMCPMC12906528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.