Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204995›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal faricimab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to central serous chorioretinopathy - a multicentre study.

Nasiq Hasan, Elham Sadeghi, Luiz H Lima, Jay C Wang, Rahul N Khurana, Avery Zhou, Charles C Wykoff, David Eichenbaum, Lihteh Wu, Alexander J Anetakis and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nasiq HasanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Elham SadeghiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Luiz H LimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jay C WangNorthern California Retina Vitreous Associates, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Rahul N KhuranaNorthern California Retina Vitreous Associates, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Avery ZhouRetina Consultants of Texas, Retina Consultants of America, Houston, TX, USA.
Charles C WykoffRetina Consultants of Texas, Retina Consultants of America, Houston, TX, USA.
David EichenbaumRetina Vitreous Associates of Florida, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA.
Lihteh WuAsociados de Macula Vitreo y Retina de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Alexander J AnetakisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Andrew W EllerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jose A SahelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jay ChhablaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. chhablanijk2@upmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1772-3558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAssess real-world efficacy and safety of intravitreal faricimab in the management of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) associated choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, Patients receiving one or more intravitreal faricimab injections for CSCR-associated CNV were included. Subgroup analysis involved both treatment-naïve individuals and those switched from prior anti-VEGF agents. Clinical and anatomical parameters including best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), neurosensory detachment (NSD), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height-were assessed at baseline and at one month after the first and third injections. Treatment response was categorized as complete resolution (absence of subretinal fluid [SRF]/intraretinal fluid [IRF]), optimal (> 50% SRF reduction or subjective IRF improvement), or suboptimal(no improvement/worsening) response.

resultsA total of 42 eyes (40 patients) across six centers were included. Mean age was 62.38 ± 9.48 years and 62.5% were males. Nineteen eyes were treatment-naïve, while 23 had received prior anti-VEGF therapy. Mean BCVA improved significantly from 0.78 ± 0.41 to 0.59 ± 0.35 logMAR after the first dose (p < 0.001), and from 0.71 ± 0.43 to 0.59 ± 0.57 logMAR following the third dose (p = 0.011). Significant reductions in CMT, SFCT, and NSD height were observed post-treatment; however, PED height did not change significantly. Similar results were seen in both subgroups after the first injection. Complete SRF resolution was achieved in 43% of eyes, with 45.7% showing optimal and 11.4% suboptimal response. One patient developed bilateral anterior uveitis after the third injection, which resolved with topical corticosteroids.

conclusionIntravitreal faricimab appears to be a safe and effective option for CSCR-associated CNV, demonstrating anatomical and functional improvements, particularly in cases with unresponsive to prior anti-VEGFs.

Indexed as

Central Serous ChorioretinopathyChoroidal NeovascularizationVisual AcuityAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, BispecificChoroidFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, BispecificfaricimabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ACentral serous chorioretinopathyChoroidal neovascularizationFaricimabOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.