Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204975›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026

Female Urethroplasty: A Critical Review of Indications, Techniques and Concerns.

Joy Narayan Chakraborty, Bhavatej Enganti, Prashant Nayak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Editorial Comment: Female Urethroplasty: A Critical Review of Indications, Techniques and Concerns.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joy Narayan ChakrabortyApollo Hospital, Guwahati, India. urochakraborty@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8281-040X
Bhavatej EngantiAsian Institute of Urology, Hyderabad, India.
Prashant NayakDepartment of Urology, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) is uncommon in women, accounting for only 2.7-8% of those referred for voiding issues. Female urethral stricture (FUS) is an infrequent type of female BOO, making up just 4-13% of cases (Colleselli et al. J Urol 160:49-54, 1998). Although urethral dilation (UD) has traditionally been the main treatment, it is often considered overused and unnecessary, leading to significant healthcare costs (Yucel et al. J Urol 171:1890-7, 2004). Recently, interest has increased in female urethroplasty, with various methods being employed to establish a permanent solution. The rarity of the condition, limited clinical experience, and concerns about functional risks such as urinary incontinence may discourage urologists from performing female urethroplasty. This review offers a practical guide for urologists managing female urethral strictures, including an overview of the female urethral sphincter mechanism and the most common urethroplasty techniques. Institutional ethics board approval is not required for this review article; however, proper consent for using operative images involving human participants has been obtained from the respective patients before surgery.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresUrethraUrethral StrictureUrinary Bladder Neck ObstructionUrologic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansDorsal onlayFemale urethral sphincterFemale urethral strictureGraft urethroplastyVentral inlayVentral onlay

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.