ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Efficient automated quantification of midline shift in intracerebral hemorrhage using a binarized deep learning model on non-contrast head CT.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate assessment of midline shift (MLS) is critical in the management of patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Manual estimation of MLS by radiologists is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. We present a lightweight, reproducible deep learning model designed for real-time, automated MLS quantification using non-contrast head CT scans.
methodsWe propose a binarized convolutional neural network based on a residual U-Net architecture that dramatically reduces model parameters (from 31 million to 44 thousand) using XNOR-based binarization and channel-wise scaling. The model segments the cerebral hemispheres and extracts midline features to quantify MLS. Post-processing involves the derivation of the deformed midline (dML) using edge detection and an anatomically guided ideal midline (iML) for reference. MLS is calculated as the maximum horizontal displacement between these lines.
resultsEvaluated on the RSNA 2019 hemorrhage CT dataset (held-out test: 5,000 slices), the model achieved Dice scores of 0.92 (left) and 0.91 (right) and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.09 mm for MLS. On an NVIDIA GTX 1650 (4 GB), median inference time was 5.6 ms per slice for the segmentation step; all physical measurements were computed at native DICOM spacing.
conclusionThis clinically-driven, resource-efficient model enables accurate MLS quantification suitable for emergency neuroimaging settings. Its reproducibility and low computational footprint make it ideal for deployment in low-resource environments, providing radiologists with rapid, decision-support insights. This lightweight model may assist accurate MLS quantification in time-sensitive settings while operating within constrained compute budgets. Further multicenter validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41204958What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.