ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Data-Driven differentiation of idiopathic Normal-Pressure hydrocephalus and progressive supranuclear palsy via automated volumetric analysis.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moving on in hydrocephalus imaging: from 2D to 3D biomarkers.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Review
- The Pathophysiology of Sinking Flap Syndrome Associated with Low-Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Case Study Suggests a New Hypothesis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to develop automated machine learning methods to differentiate idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) from progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) using advanced imaging features and volumetric analysis.
methodsWe analyzed T1-weighted 3D brain MRI scans of iNPH and PSP patients using automated component measurement acquisition and deep learning-based automated volumetric analysis. We grouped the MRI features as brainstem subgroup, volumetrics subgroup, midbrain to pons (MP) ratio subgroup (included the midbrain to pons area ratio and volume ratio), and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH) subgroup (included the callosal angle, Sylvian fissure empty ratio, vertex region crowding ratio, and Evans' index). Key imaging features were quantified, and statistical comparisons were conducted to identify distinguishing characteristics. Machine learning models were applied to evaluate feature effectiveness and improve diagnostic classification accuracy.
resultsThis study analyzed 192 patients (132 iNPH, 60 PSP) and found significant differences in midbrain volume, midbrain to pons volume ratio, callosal angle, Sylvian fissure empty ratio, vertex region crowding ratio, and Evans' index. Machine learning models, particularly the linear Support Vector Machine (SVM), achieved high diagnostic accuracy (AUROC = 0.98) in distinguishing iNPH from PSP. Volumetric analysis outperformed other feature subgroups.
conclusionThe deep learning-based automated brain volumetric analysis achieved high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing iNPH from PSP using T1-weighted brain MR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41204957What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.