Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204901›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental science & technology2025

Global Meta-Analysis Integrated with Machine Learning Assesses Context-Dependent Microplastic Effects on Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen.

Yangzhou Xiang, Matthias C Rillig, Josep Peñuelas, Luca Nizzetto, Jordi Sardans, Jian Long, Jiachang Zhang, Rui Li, Ying Liu, Yang Luo and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yangzhou XiangSchool of Geography and Resources, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang 550018, China.
Matthias C RilligInstitut für Biologie, Berlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (BBIB), Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin D-14195, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3541-7853
Josep PeñuelasCSIC Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra 08193, Catalonia, Spain.
Luca NizzettoNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Økernveien 94, Oslo 0579, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-657X
Jordi SardansCSIC Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra 08193, Catalonia, Spain.
Jian LongSchool of Geography and Resources, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang 550018, China.
Jiachang ZhangCollege of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou 730020, China.
Rui LiState Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Linze Inland River Basin Research Station, Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Ying LiuSchool of Biological Sciences, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang 550018, China.
Yang LuoSchool of Geography and Resources, Guizhou Education University, Guiyang 550018, China.
Bin YaoState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Institute of Ecology Conservation and Restoration, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, PR China.
Yuan LiGrasslands and Sustainable Farming, Production Systems Unit, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Halolantie 31 A, Maaninka 71750, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1047-0690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) in soil can paradoxically stimulate microbial biomass in a highly context-dependent manner, potentially inducing decomposition and affecting carbon and nitrogen cycles. We conducted a global meta-analysis with 90 studies (710 observations of microbial biomass carbon (MBC), 354 of microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN)) integrated with machine learning to quantify MPs effects on soil microbial biomass. Field studies showed no significant effects, contrasting with controlled experiments where MPs increased MBC by 9.6% (95% CI: 7.2-11.9%) and MBN by 10.4% (6.8-14.0%). Biodegradable plastics (PBAT, PLA) induced stronger effects (36.1-67.6%) than conventional polymers (PE, PP, PS, PVC). Temperature emerged as the dominant factor, with a contrasting MPs effect on MBC (positive) and MBN (negative) at higher temperatures, suggesting potential decoupling of carbon and nitrogen cycles under warming conditions. Machine learning models (XGBoost,

Indexed as

Machine LearningMicroplasticsSoil MicrobiologyBiomassCarbonNitrogenSoilCarbonMicroplasticsNitrogenSoilbiodegradable plasticscarbon cyclingnitrogen cyclingsoil microbial biomasstemperature effects

Identifiers

PMID41204901
PMCPMC12713787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.