ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Quantification of cure for pharmacodynamic models of antimalarial drugs: Deterministic versus stochastic approaches.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantification of cure for pharmacodynamic models of antimalarial drugs: Deterministic versus stochastic approaches.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In silico pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models are used to inform dose optimisation in antimalarial drug development. Here the PK-PD models capture the change in parasite count over time because of exposure to antimalarial drug(s). For current deterministic PD models, simulated parasite numbers decline proportionally during treatment asymptotically approaching zero, requiring a cure threshold to be selected. We implemented an alternative stochastic model, where parasite-time profiles were simulated using a binomial function with an hourly parasite survival probability. This probabilistic model enables a time of exact cure to be calculated, when zero parasites remain. The 28-day cure rates predicted by the deterministic and stochastic models for multiple antimalarial treatment strategies were equivalent, with an absolute difference ranging from -0.8% to 3.1% (mean of 0.48%, positive values indicate higher stochastic model cure rates). This confirms that the standard deterministic method is an adequate proxy for the underlying stochastic process of parasite death during antimalarial treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.