ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Climate and Land-Use Changes Predicted to Jointly Drive Soil Fungal Diversity Losses in One-Third of North American Coniferous Forests.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Climate Change Projected to Double the Richness and Abundance of Soilborne Phytopathogenic Fungi in Southern Maritime Antarctica.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Climate and Land-Use Changes Predicted to Jointly Drive Soil Fungal Diversity Losses in One-Third of North American Coniferous Forests.Global change biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil fungi underpin key ecosystem functions but face increasing threats from climate and land-use changes, with their future impacts remaining unclear. This uncertainty is exacerbated by limited large-scale data and the challenge of quantifying and comparing both factors at comparable spatial scales. By leveraging two continental-scale sampling networks in North America and applying stacked species distribution models combined with countryside species-area relationship frameworks, we assessed the impacts of climate and land-use change on soil fungal diversity and identified regions affected by both factors across four biomes. We projected climate and land-use change by incorporating shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) and associated greenhouse gas-induced radiative forcing, focusing on moderate- (SSP2-4.5) and high-emission (SSP5-8.5) scenarios. Climate change typically led to both diversity losses and gains, particularly in coniferous forests and among arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Land-use change predominantly caused diversity losses under SSP2-4.5, especially in broadleaf-mixed forests and for ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi, with these effects diminished under SSP5-8.5 due to minimal land-use changes. Across emission scenarios, both factors were predicted to cause widespread diversity losses in coniferous forests (whole-community, EM fungi, and soil saprotrophs) and grasslands (AM fungi and plant pathogens) while promoting gains in broadleaf-mixed forests (whole-community, EM fungi, and saprotrophs) and coniferous forests (AM fungi and pathogens). These results support the need for biome- and guild-specific fungal conservation planning under global change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.