ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2026
Mechanical Modeling of Cardiac Fibrosis With Explicit Spatial Representation of Cellular Structure and Collagen Alignment.
Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac fibrosis is a pathological condition involving remodeling that impairs cardiac function. Common forms include replacement fibrosis, where damaged myocytes are substituted by collagenous tissue, and interstitial fibrosis, involving matrix expansion between the myocytes. These occur alongside other remodeling processes, including myocardial stiffening and collagen alignment. The mechanical impact of each process remains an active area of investigation. In this work, we used a computational model with explicit myocyte and collagen geometries to study the microscale mechanical effects of fibrotic remodeling. Replacement fibrosis was simulated by substituting myocytes with extracellular matrix, while interstitial fibrosis was modeled by increasing transverse spacing between the cells. These geometric changes were combined with increased matrix and myocyte stiffness and collagen alignment to assess individual and combined effects during contraction and stretch. Structural changes alone led to substantially higher myocyte stresses during contraction (53.9 kPa for increased interstitial space and 35.4 kPa for myocyte replacement, versus 30.9 kPa at baseline). Collagen alignment and myocyte stiffening mitigated increased stress levels. Stretch experiments showed less structural differences in resulting tissue-level load values, which combined with stiffening were slightly higher for increased interstitial space. Individual and combined analyzes attributed total tissue stiffening more to myocyte than matrix stiffening. Our findings suggest that fibrotic remodeling leads to elevated stress in surviving myocytes. Myocyte stiffening and collagen alignment may serve compensatory roles, while also increasing tissue-level stiffness. Integrating microscale modeling with experimental data in future studies may offer deeper insights into the mechanical consequences of fibrotic remodeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.