ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Estradiol is not protective against angiotensin II-induced hypertension in middle-aged ovariectomized rats.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Estradiol is not protective against angiotensin II-induced hypertension in middle-aged ovariectomized rats.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Menopause leads to loss of cardiovascular and renal protection, and while hormone therapy offers benefits, its efficacy may depend on health status at menopause onset. We hypothesized that preexisting hypertension blunts the renal, cardiac, and vascular effects of Estradiol (E2). Female Long-Evans rats were ovariectomized (OVX) at 46 weeks to model menopause and received either E2 or vehicle, and some were infused with angiotensin II (ANG; 700 ng/kg/min) 4 weeks before OVX. Blood pressure (BP) was measured by tail cuff, renal function by urine collection, collagen deposition by histology, and mRNA expression in aorta and kidney by droplet digital PCR. ANG increased BP and proteinuria (p = 0.02), water intake (p < 0.001), urinary output, heart weight, and aortic NOX4 (p < 0.01), confirming hypertension and oxidative stress. E2 reduced body weight (p = 0.02), increased bone mineral content (p = 0.01), and prevented uterine atrophy (p < 0.001), confirming E2 treatment. While E2 attenuated cardiac hypertrophy (p = 0.004), it exacerbated proteinuria, decreased GFR (p < 0.05), and failed to reduce aortic NOX4. ANG did not affect tissue estrogen receptor expression, while E2 showed tissue-specific regulation of GPER and ERα. In this hypertensive OVX model, E2 failed to protect renal and vascular damage, emphasizing the importance of cardiovascular health at menopause when considering hormone therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.