Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204387›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Implementation and evaluation of a psychological first aid program to manage post-traumatic stress injuries among Canadian police officers.

Séphora Minjoz, Delphine Collin-Vézina, Christine Genest, R Nicholas Carleton, Rosemary Ricciardelli, Sandra Moll, Geneviève St-Hilaire, Steve Geoffrion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Séphora MinjozTrauma Studies Center, Research Center of the University Institute in Mental Health of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. sephora.minjoz@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-8308
Delphine Collin-VézinaResearch Center on Children and Families, School of Social Work, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Christine GenestTrauma Studies Center, Research Center of the University Institute in Mental Health of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
R Nicholas CarletonDepartment of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.
Rosemary RicciardelliDepartment of Sociology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada.
Sandra MollSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Child Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Geneviève St-HilaireService Santé et Prévention, Sûreté du Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Steve GeoffrionTrauma Studies Center, Research Center of the University Institute in Mental Health of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 892-2020-3010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolice officers are exposed to potentially psychological traumatic events and are at high risk of developing post-traumatic stress injuries (PTSI). Development and wide implementation of best practices for managing PTSI are needed. The psychological first aid (PFA) framework encompasses trauma-informed knowledge to guide the development of best practices. Based on the framework and on a pilot performed among Canadian police officers, we propose a PFA program including: 1) PTSI awareness e-learning; 2) PFA training provided by local trainers; and, 3) peer-to-peer PFA intervention to mitigate PTSI in police officers. The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a large-scale PFA program implementation among Canadian police officers.

methodsA multi-phase mixed-methods participatory action research study is being performed in five phases according to the PFA implementation and the dynamic sustainability frameworks. The program 1) was adapted to environmental needs; 2) is progressively deployed; and, to be evaluated for 3) feasibility; 4) effectiveness; and, 5) sustainability. Local trainers (N = 10) were trained to then train PFA providers (N = 322 police officers) who could then administer the intervention to police officers as needed (i.e., PFA recipients). The e-learning is being co-developed and will be disseminated. Program feasibility (i.e., acceptability, demand, practicality, implementation) will be assessed through interviews with trainers (n = 10), providers (n = 30), and recipients (n = 20). The program effectiveness will be assessed by tracking changes in PTSI literacy and stigma among officers who complete the e-learning (n = 5700) using pre-post e-learning questionnaires. Pre-post training questionnaires with participating providers (n = 175) will track perceived competence to provide the intervention. Pre-post intervention questionnaires with recipients (n = 64) will track changes in putative protective factors (i.e., professional quality of life, work safety, coping, sense of efficacy, sense of hope) and symptoms of PTSI (i.e., anxiety-, depressive-, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms). DISCUSSION: The PFA program is designed to help officers to recognize PTSI, promote self-care strategies and help-seeking, enhance organizational support, and expand psychological support. The study could provide trauma-informed guidelines for implementation and evaluation practices in high-risk and interdependent organizations and inform future directions for policy decisions.

trial registrationThe study was pre-registered on OSF ( https://osf.io/7khgs/?view_only=33260c704ffc46ffb75a704320283ccf ).

Indexed as

E-learningMixed-methods participatory action researchPeer supportPolicePost-traumatic stress injuriesPsychological first aid

Identifiers

PMID41204387
PMCPMC12598843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.