Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204357›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

The role of surface EMG in predicting responsiveness of muscles to FES therapy after cervical SCI.

Guijin Li, Gustavo Balbinot, Sharmini Atputharaj, Gita Gholamrezaei, Julio C Furlan, Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan, José Zariffa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guijin LiKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. guijin.li@mail.utoronto.ca.
Gustavo BalbinotDepartment of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Sharmini AtputharajKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Gita GholamrezaeiKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Julio C FurlanKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Sukhvinder Kalsi-RyanKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
José ZariffaKITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Wings for Life 210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical spinal cord injury (SCI) can severely impair upper extremity (UE) functions, limiting independence and quality of life. Prior clinical trials showed that functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy can reduce UE impairment. However, the response to FES therapy is not consistent across all treated myotomes. Our objective was to predict the muscle response to FES therapy using electrophysiological biomarkers from baseline surface electromyography (sEMG) signals, in order to support treatment decisions at the point of care.

methodsWe recruited 17 participants with cervical SCI, who were about to undergo FES therapy. Target UE muscles were identified for each participant by treating therapists. Baseline sEMG signals were recorded from the target muscles during resting and maximal voluntary contractions. Time- and frequency-domain features were extracted. The manual muscle testing (MMT) score was tracked through the therapy cycle, and used to categorize each muscle as a responder or non-responder. We explored classifiers including support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and logistic regression, with leave-one-participant-out cross validation. Models were trained on sEMG features alone, on clinical variables alone, and combinations of both.

resultsThe final dataset consisted of sEMG recordings of 132 muscles from 17 participants, and 33% of the muscles were considered responders. A Random Forest classifier with a forward-selected feature set yielded the best performance (Matthews correlation coefficient = 0.41, F1 score = 0.68, accuracy = 76%, precision = 0.72, recall = 0.42, and true negative rate = 0.92). With patient stratification based on motor completeness (AIS A-B vs. C-D), the model performance further improved. Included signal features were slope sign changes, mean and median frequency, and second-order spectral moment.

conclusionsOur results suggest that baseline sEMG signals combined with machine learning models may be used to predict muscle response to FES therapy in individuals with cervical SCI. The models were trained on a small and unbalanced sample and can be optimized with more participants in the future. This work contributes to improving the level of personalization and efficacy of FES therapy, and ultimately improve quality of life after SCI.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyElectromyographyMuscle, SkeletalSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultCervical CordFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMachine learningRecovery predictionSpinal cord injurySurface electromyography

Identifiers

PMID41204357
PMCPMC12595692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.