ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
The role of surface EMG in predicting responsiveness of muscles to FES therapy after cervical SCI.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCervical spinal cord injury (SCI) can severely impair upper extremity (UE) functions, limiting independence and quality of life. Prior clinical trials showed that functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy can reduce UE impairment. However, the response to FES therapy is not consistent across all treated myotomes. Our objective was to predict the muscle response to FES therapy using electrophysiological biomarkers from baseline surface electromyography (sEMG) signals, in order to support treatment decisions at the point of care.
methodsWe recruited 17 participants with cervical SCI, who were about to undergo FES therapy. Target UE muscles were identified for each participant by treating therapists. Baseline sEMG signals were recorded from the target muscles during resting and maximal voluntary contractions. Time- and frequency-domain features were extracted. The manual muscle testing (MMT) score was tracked through the therapy cycle, and used to categorize each muscle as a responder or non-responder. We explored classifiers including support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and logistic regression, with leave-one-participant-out cross validation. Models were trained on sEMG features alone, on clinical variables alone, and combinations of both.
resultsThe final dataset consisted of sEMG recordings of 132 muscles from 17 participants, and 33% of the muscles were considered responders. A Random Forest classifier with a forward-selected feature set yielded the best performance (Matthews correlation coefficient = 0.41, F1 score = 0.68, accuracy = 76%, precision = 0.72, recall = 0.42, and true negative rate = 0.92). With patient stratification based on motor completeness (AIS A-B vs. C-D), the model performance further improved. Included signal features were slope sign changes, mean and median frequency, and second-order spectral moment.
conclusionsOur results suggest that baseline sEMG signals combined with machine learning models may be used to predict muscle response to FES therapy in individuals with cervical SCI. The models were trained on a small and unbalanced sample and can be optimized with more participants in the future. This work contributes to improving the level of personalization and efficacy of FES therapy, and ultimately improve quality of life after SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.