ArticleBMC public health2025
Determinants of childhood diarrhea in low- and middle-income countries: a comparative analysis of epidemiological and machine learning approaches.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Missing data practices in DHS-based child health research in sub-Saharan Africa: a methodological review of diarrhea and acute respiratory infection studies.Global health action · 2026Review
- Time-Series Analysis and Age-Stratified Forecasting of Diarrheal Disease in Rwanda Using SARIMA Models.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Deployment of a machine learning-based predictive system for childhood diarrhea in Sub-Saharan Africa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The pig as a preclinical model for human phage therapy of polybacterial enteric infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiarrheal disease remains a major cause of under-five mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study investigates the diarrhea determinants, employing a novel dual approach comparing classical epidemiology and machine learning (ML) to determine the most important predictors and to optimize intervention targeting in Nigeria.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis of 33,924 children aged < 5 years using 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) was used. Traditional logistic regression was contrasted to ML models (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machines, Decision Trees) to consider non-linear associations and variable importance, while using model parameters to assess model performance.
resultsThe prevalence of diarrhea was 11.98%, with significant disparities between regions. Child's age was the strongest predictor across all models, with a significant odd seen among children aged 6-23 months (AOR = 2.48-2.54). Increased maternal education was protective (AOR = 0.77-0.79), while exposure to the media had multicomponent associations. Urban-rural wealth index was a robust strong socioeconomic predictor. Logistic regression had the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.727), closely followed by that of Gradient Boosting (AUC = 0.718). Sensitivity analysis showed that MICE generated more accurate estimates than complete case analysis because missingness was not random.
conclusionThe study stresses the significance of core modifiable determinants such as maternal education and contextual wealth. Methodological triangulation illustrates the complementarity of classic regression for inference and machine learning for feature discovery. These findings justify the imposition of hyper-localized, multi-sectoral interventions on high-risk age groups and areas based on sound data analysis to optimize public health resources. This mixed approach provides a scalable model for disease burden measurement in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.