Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204165›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

Phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis for acute angle-closure glaucoma: impact of preoperative IOP status.

Chan Xiong, Yangyang Dai, Hai He, Hongdou Luo, Haina Zheng, Xueqing Yu, Lu Yang, Xu Zhang, Zhipeng You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chan XiongJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Ophthalmology, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Disease, Nanchang University, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Yangyang DaiJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Ophthalmology, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Disease, Nanchang University, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Hai HeJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Ophthalmology, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Disease, Nanchang University, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Hongdou LuoJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Ophthalmology, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Disease, Nanchang University, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Haina ZhengJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Ophthalmology, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Disease, Nanchang University, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Xueqing YuJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Ophthalmology, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Disease, Nanchang University, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Lu YangJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Ophthalmology, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Disease, Nanchang University, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Xu ZhangJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Ophthalmology, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Disease, Nanchang University, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China. xuzhang19@163.com.
Zhipeng YouJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Ophthalmology, Jiangxi Medical College, Jiangxi Research Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical Research Center for Ophthalmic Disease, Nanchang University, Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China. yzp74@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PRéCIS: Treatment of acute angle-closure glaucoma with phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis significantly improves patients' visual acuity and reduce intraocular pressure; the preoperative condition has minimal influence on the treatment outcome. PURPOSE: The study aimed to treat acute angle-closure glaucoma and explore the structural differences of the anterior segment as well as the influence of persistent high intraocular pressure on surgical outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective case-control study included 120 patients (122 eyes) with acute angle-closure glaucoma, divided into two groups based on intraocular pressure two hours post-drug treatment: a normotensive group (21 mmHg or below; 54 subjects/55 eyes) and a hypertensive group (> 21 mmHg; 66 patients/67 eyes). Anterior segment structures, corneal endothelial cell density, and other parameters were systematically analyzed. All patients underwent phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis. Statistical analysis employed independent-samples t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, as appropriate.

resultsThere was no significant difference in the anterior segment structure between the two groups (P > 0.05) except for anterior chamber depth (t = -2.541, P = 0.012). Corneal endothelial cell density was significantly higher in the normotensive group than in the hypertensive group (Z = -0.399, P = 0.026).Postoperative visual acuity improved in both groups (Z = -8.663, P < 0.01), but no significant intergroup difference was observed (Z = -1.201, P = 0.23).Intraocular pressure decreased significantly in both groups (t = 25.901, P < 0.01). with a more pronounced reduction in the hypertensive group (Z = -3.387, P = 0.01).

conclusionsIn medically treated acute angle-closure glaucoma, anterior chamber depth differed significantly between the normotensive and hypertensive groups ( P = 0.012), whereas no significant differences were observed in other anterior segment parameters (P > 0.05). Following phacoemulsification combined with goniosynechialysis, both visual acuity and intraocular improved. Preoperative persistent high intraocular pressure has no significant effect on surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Angle-ClosureIntraocular PressurePhacoemulsificationAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTonometry, OcularVisual AcuityAcute angle-closure glaucomaGoniosynechialysisIntraocular pressurePhacoemulsification

Identifiers

PMID41204165
PMCPMC12595844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.