Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204154›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Low participation in cancer screening in India: a scoping review of breast and cervical cancer programs.

Jubina Balan Venghateri, Priyansh Nathani, Shreya Goyal, Bhakti Sarang, Harshal Rawtani, Priti Patil, Deepa Kv, Nethra Jain, Anita Gadgil, Nobhojit Roy

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gastrointestinal cancers in women: The role of sex hormones.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jubina Balan VenghateriWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India.
Priyansh NathaniWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India.
Shreya GoyalWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India.
Bhakti SarangWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India.
Harshal RawtaniWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India.
Priti PatilWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India.
Deepa KvWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India.
Nethra JainWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India.
Anita GadgilWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India.
Nobhojit RoyWHO Collaborating Centre for Emergency, Critical and Operative Care, Mumbai, India. nobhojit.roy@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndia is witnessing a high and rising burden of breast and cervical cancers. More than one-third of cases in India are attributed to these two cancers. Early detection and access to affordable and timely treatment are known to reduce the burden of cancer-related deaths. Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) face significant challenges in implementing organized early-detection programs due to inadequate resources, contributing to high mortality from these cancers. Recognizing this critical public health issue, this study evaluates the published literature and government reports on the implementation of breast and cervical cancer screening programs in India.

methodsLiterature was systematically searched from six databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. In addition, reports on the National Health Mission website were reviewed to capture screening efforts that were not published in the peer-reviewed literature.

results59 peer-reviewed manuscripts were identified, from 57 screening programs. The number of screening programs from Northern and Eastern states is low. Community programs focused on task shifting and engagement of local stakeholders for increasing participation. Clinical Breast Examination (CBE) and Visual inspection of the cervix (VIA) remain the mainstay of screening efforts. The main barriers to screening uptake by women were lower education, lower socioeconomic status, lack of transportation, and suboptimal services. Information on screening programs lacked uniformity in reporting and data collection.

conclusionThese results highlight that screening efforts in India remain disjointed and programs by different agencies need to be aligned through uniform distribution, methodology, and reporting, towards goals set by global initiatives.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIndiaBreast neoplasmsDiagnostic screening programsEarly detection of cancerIndiaUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID41204154
PMCPMC12593890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.