Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204141›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Incremental 2D self-labelling for effective 3D medical volume segmentation with minimal annotations.

Matthew Anderson, Maged Habib, David H Steel, Boguslaw Obara

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew AndersonSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, 1, Urban Sciences Building, Science Square, 1 Science Square, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, UK.
Maged HabibSunderland Eye Infirmary, National Health Service, Queen Alexandra Rd, Sunderland, SR2 9HP, UK.
David H SteelSunderland Eye Infirmary, National Health Service, Queen Alexandra Rd, Sunderland, SR2 9HP, UK.
Boguslaw ObaraSchool of Computing, Newcastle University, 1, Urban Sciences Building, Science Square, 1 Science Square, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, UK. boguslaw.obara@newcastle.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development and application of deep learning-based models have seen significant success in medical image segmentation, transforming diagnostic and treatment processes. However, these advancements often rely on large, fully annotated datasets, which are challenging to obtain due to the labour-intensive and costly nature of expert annotation. Therefore, we sought to explore the feasibility and efficacy of training 2D models under severe annotation constraints, aiming to optimise segmentation performance while minimising annotation costs.

methodsWe propose an incremental 2D self-labelling framework for segmenting 3D medical volumes from a single annotated slice per volume. A 2D U-Net is first trained on these central slices. The model then iteratively generates and filters pseudo-labels for adjacent slices, progressively fine-tuning itself on an expanding dataset. This process is repeated until the entire training set is pseudo-labelled to produce the final model.

resultsOn brain MRI and liver CECT datasets, our self-labelling approach improved segmentation performance compared to using only the sparse ground-truth data, increasing the Dice Similarity Coefficient and Intersection over Union by up to 15.95% and 26.75%, respectively. It also improved 3D continuity, reducing the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance from 69.88 mm to 36.46 mm. Parameter analysis revealed that a gradual propagation of high-confidence pseudo-labels was most effective.

conclusionOur framework demonstrates that a computationally efficient 2D model can be leveraged through self-labelling to achieve robust 3D segmentation performance and coherence from extremely sparse annotations, offering a viable solution to reduce the annotation burden in medical imaging.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainHumansLiverDeep learningMedical image segmentationMinimal annotationsSelf-labelling

Identifiers

PMID41204141
PMCPMC12595916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.