ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Incremental 2D self-labelling for effective 3D medical volume segmentation with minimal annotations.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development and application of deep learning-based models have seen significant success in medical image segmentation, transforming diagnostic and treatment processes. However, these advancements often rely on large, fully annotated datasets, which are challenging to obtain due to the labour-intensive and costly nature of expert annotation. Therefore, we sought to explore the feasibility and efficacy of training 2D models under severe annotation constraints, aiming to optimise segmentation performance while minimising annotation costs.
methodsWe propose an incremental 2D self-labelling framework for segmenting 3D medical volumes from a single annotated slice per volume. A 2D U-Net is first trained on these central slices. The model then iteratively generates and filters pseudo-labels for adjacent slices, progressively fine-tuning itself on an expanding dataset. This process is repeated until the entire training set is pseudo-labelled to produce the final model.
resultsOn brain MRI and liver CECT datasets, our self-labelling approach improved segmentation performance compared to using only the sparse ground-truth data, increasing the Dice Similarity Coefficient and Intersection over Union by up to 15.95% and 26.75%, respectively. It also improved 3D continuity, reducing the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance from 69.88 mm to 36.46 mm. Parameter analysis revealed that a gradual propagation of high-confidence pseudo-labels was most effective.
conclusionOur framework demonstrates that a computationally efficient 2D model can be leveraged through self-labelling to achieve robust 3D segmentation performance and coherence from extremely sparse annotations, offering a viable solution to reduce the annotation burden in medical imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.