ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Double-filtration plasmapheresis as an adjunct to therapy for severe early-onset maternal erythrocyte alloimmunization.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundErythrocyte alloimmunization is an important cause of hemolytic disease in fetuses and newborn (HDFN). Intrauterine blood transfusion (IUT) is the standard treatment for anemic fetuses, but there are adverse reactions, especially before 20 weeks of gestation. Here, we used double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) as an adjunct therapy to prolong the time to receive IUT safely. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of DFPP for early-onset HDFN during pregnancy.
methodWe recruited pregnant women with a high risk of early-onset HDFN. The DFPP procedure was performed by a plasmapheresis machine using a plasma separator and a plasma component separator. A 5% albumin solution served as the replacement fluid. A central venous catheter was used for DFPP. The blood flow rate was 120–150 ml/min, and the plasma separation rate was 1200–1500 ml/h. The rates of discarding the plasma and replenishing the plasma were 150–200 ml/h. The plasma volume to treat each patient was calculated via the Kaplan formula. Anticoagulation was achieved with low-molecular-weight heparin. The treatment goal was to reduce the ratio of antibodies to less than 1:32 or to maintain fetal MCA-PSV < 1.5 MoM, thereby prolonging pregnancy to allow safe IUT when necessary. Epidemiological data and hematological parameters as well as side effects were evaluated before and after DFPP.
resultsA total of 6 patients, including 5 with Rh and 1 with MN-associated maternal–fetal hemolysis, were analyzed. DFPP was initiated at a median gestational age of 14 weeks (range: 12–18). Patients received a median of 8 sessions (range: 3–9) over 4 weeks (range: 2– 5), with 3000 mL (range: 2000–3250) of plasma processed per session. A total of 40 procedures were performed. Anti-D/M antibody titers decreased by a median of 50% after each session . Other proteins, such as albumins, globulins, and complement and coagulation factors, also decreased significantly after DFPP treatment, whereas white blood cells, neutrophil and hemoglobin increased after DFPP treatment. However, coagulation factor levels returned to normal levels the next day. No obvious side effects were observed during the entire treatment period. Five women successfully prolonged pregnancy until 20 weeks of gestation and underwent IUTs, whereas one woman failed at 15 weeks of gestation due to severe fetal anemia and underwent induced labor. The cohort received a total of 26 transfusions, with a median of 5 procedures (range: 1–6) per patient over a median treatment duration of 9.5 weeks (range: 1–14).
conclusionsThese favorable results indicate that DFPP is an effective and safe rescue therapy for pregnant women with maternal incompatible hemolytic anemia. However, more clinical trials with larger sample sizes, long-term follow-up, and cost‒benefit analyses are needed to better evaluate its application value and prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.