ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Women's experience with a first- and second-degree perineal tear and episiotomy - a qualitative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerineal tears are associated with both physical- and psychological complications, and studies have found that women’s individual experience of the pain from the tear does not necessarily reflect the extent and severity of the tear. Women seem to experience a lack of consistency and sufficient follow up in the post-partum period related to perineal trauma. The aim of this study was to explore women’s experiences with first- and second- degree perineal tears and episiotomy in the post-partum period in an outpatient perineal clinic at a tertiary hospital in Norway. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews, with women experiencing a follow-up of their perineal tear from an outpatient clinic. Participants were recruited from one tertiary hospital in Norway, and we conducted 18 individual interviews. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using systematic text condensation as described by Malterud.
resultsThree code groups and one overarching theme were identified. The overarching theme was that the women experienced a feeling of being left alone with the responsibility of both their physical and psychological needs regarding their perineal tear. The women described (I) lack of affirmation and emotional support, (II) lack of guidance on normal processes and (III) lack of systematic follow up of perineal tears.
conclusionThe women in this study felt they were left alone with their perineal tear and did not receive support nor recognition from healthcare professionals regarding the challenges they faced. The physical and psychological consequences women experienced related to their perineal tear highlight the need for a more systematically and individually tailored care for women in the post-partum period, from both midwives and doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.