ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Development and Validation of a Combined Caprini Score and D-Dimer Model for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in High-Altitude Hospitalized Patients.
Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Caprini score for venous thromboembolism risk assessment: A scoping review of applications, validation, and future directions.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- Venous thromboembolism at high altitude: mechanisms, risk stratification, and precision prevention.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- AI-enabled D-dimeromics in precision breast oncology: a transformative framework for the identification, stratification, and prognostication of ultra-high-risk disease phenotypes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in high-altitude hospitalized patients by combining the Caprini score with D-dimer levels and assessing the impact of platelet count in a unique cohort.MethodsWe enrolled 1002 hospitalized patients at Lhasa People's Hospital (3650 m). Clinical data, including Caprini score, D-dimer, and platelet count, were collected at admission. Logistic regression identified predictors of VTE, and model performance was evaluated using ROC curves, with sensitivity analyses excluding patients on thromboprophylaxis. External validation was performed in 400 patients from the Tibet Military Region General Hospital using the same protocol.ResultsAmong the 1002 hospitalized patients, 135 (13.5%) developed venous thromboembolism (VTE), consisting of 61 cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 42 cases of pulmonary embolism (PE), and 32 cases of both DVT and PE. Multivariate analysis identified Caprini score, D-dimer levels, platelet count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) as independent predictors of VTE. However, platelet count and CRP were excluded from the final predictive model due to their limited incremental predictive value. The combined Caprini-D-dimer model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89, compared to 0.84 for Caprini score and 0.81 for D-dimer alone. Sensitivity analysis excluding patients who received thromboprophylaxis improved the AUC to 0.904. External validation in a cohort of 400 patients confirmed the model's robustness with an AUC of 0.86.ConclusionThe combined Caprini score and D-dimer model provides a more accurate tool for predicting VTE risk in high-altitude hospitalized patients compared to individual predictors. This model offers enhanced sensitivity and specificity, making it a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in high-altitude settings. The model maintained high predictive performance after excluding patients receiving prophylactic anticoagulation, suggesting robustness across different clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.