ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Evaluating Transferability of ComBat Harmonization of Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraditional use of the ComBat data harmonization method (a popular means of harmonizing multisite MRI data) is limited by the requirement that the harmonization must be recomputed with any addition of new subjects to the data pool. The goal of this study was to assess whether a transferable ComBat (T-ComBat) algorithm could be applied such that harmonization parameters computed using ComBat on a fixed set of diffusion tensor (DT) MRI training subject data could be reapplied to harmonize new, previously unseen subject data without alteration of the harmonized training data. Emphasis was given to evaluating the necessary size of such a training data pool.
methodsFractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) maps for 314 adolescents were harmonized across two MRI scanning sites using the T-ComBat method applied to new subject data for a variety of training group sizes. For each training group size, FA and MD maps were assessed for differences across sites after T-ComBat on voxel-wise and region-of-interest-wise (ROI) levels. Voxels and ROIs were tested for significant differences across sites.
resultsT-ComBat yielded improved harmonization across sites but did not reach the performance of full ComBat. A limited number of new subjects (approximately 25% for FA, 10% for MD) could be harmonized via T-ComBat and still yield a sufficiently harmonized total dataset.
conclusionT-ComBat may be applied to harmonize DT-MRI data from a limited number of new subjects from previously seen scanners without necessitating the reharmonization of previously analyzed data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.