Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204022›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Pelvic position significantly influences the segmental lumbar lordosis: a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic population.

SiYu Zhou, YuDong Zhao, Yi Zhao, ZhiQian Luo, HongBin He, JunJie Ma, WeiPeng Qiu, GengYu Han, ZhuoRan Sun, Weishi Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

SiYu ZhouPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
YuDong ZhaoPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yi ZhaoPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
ZhiQian LuoPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
HongBin HePeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
JunJie MaPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
WeiPeng QiuPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
GengYu HanPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
ZhuoRan SunPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Weishi LiPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. puh3liweishi@163.com.

Funding

Key Clinical Projects of the hospital BYSYZD2023048National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC3604400National Natural Science Foundation of China 82302739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the concept of lumbar surgical planning, it was often seen as a linear relationship between Pelvic Incidence (PI) and Lumbar Lordosis (LL) that a bigger PI referred to a larger LL. While the discovery and high prevalence of pelvic anteversion (AP) population indicated otherwise. The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of pelvic anteversion on lumbar sagittal parameters and elucidate the different PI-related lordosis patterns in asymptomatic population.

methodsA total of 405 asymptomatic subjects were divided by their pelvic property into 2 groups: the anteverted pelvis (AP) group (n = 151) and the non-AP group (n = 254). Spinopelvic parameters including PI, pelvic tilt (PT), LL, sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 Pelvic angle (TPA), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar tilt (LT), lumbar lordosis distribution (LDI) and segmental lordosis were measured in whole spine radiographs. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to establish a PI-balanced cohort. Subsequently, the differences of spinopelvic parameters were assessed between AP and non-AP group. We also conducted a stratified analysis to explore the relationship between different pelvic incidence (PI) levels and segmental lordosis.

resultsThe AP group showed distinct sagittal parameters and PI-related lordosis patterns comparing to non-AP group. The AP group showed lower PI (41.5°±6.0°), PT (4.7°±2.7°), and higher SS (37.3°±5.4°) and LL (53.0°±8.6°) than non-AP group. After propensity score matching, the cohort of 268 subjects showed no significant differences in demographic data (P > 0.1) or PI (P = 0.364) between the AP and non-AP groups. However, significant differences in PT, SS, LL, TPA, L5-S1, L4-5, L3-4, L2-3, upper lumbar lordosis (L1-4) and lower lumbar lordosis (L4-S1) were observed between the two groups (P < 0.01). Only L1-2 segmental lordosis displayed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.39). In addition, in each PI level, the AP group showed consistently greater LL and segmental lordosis compared to the non-AP group, with the most notable differences in the lower lumbar segments.

conclusionThe AP group, characterized by lower PI and PT, and higher SS and LL, should be recognized as a distinct population from the non-AP group. This group also exhibits unique PI-related lordosis patterns, with consistently significant variations in segmental lordosis within each PI level compared to the non-AP group, particularly in the lower lumbar spine.

Indexed as

LordosisLumbar VertebraePelvisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyAsymptomatic populationLumbar lordosisPelvic anteversionPropensity score matchingSagittal alignment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.