Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41204018›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2025

"CRP-first" algorithm to guide imaging in suspected renal colic: a retrospective UK cohort study.

Sayed Borna Farzaneh, Edward Antram, Sarah Naunton, Arpan Patel, Obi Ajuluchukwu, Naren Govindarajah, Lakshmi Ratnam, Marco Bolgeri, Nirav Patel, Anita Wale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sayed Borna Farzaneh *Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Edward Antram *Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sarah NauntonDepartment of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Arpan PatelDepartment of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Obi AjuluchukwuDepartment of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Naren GovindarajahDepartment of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lakshmi RatnamDepartment of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Marco BolgeriDepartment of Urology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nirav PatelDepartment of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anita WaleDepartment of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. anita.wale@stgeorges.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-4670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether admission C-reactive protein (CRP) can triage patients with suspected renal colic to low dose non contrast CT KUB or contrast enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) at first presentation.

methodsRetrospective single centre diagnostic accuracy study in a United Kingdom emergency department. Index test was admission CRP with a prespecified cut-off of 5 mg/L (positive if CRP ≥ 5 mg/L). Reference standard was CT classified a priori as: A normal, B simple calculus, C complicated calculus, D alternative acute diagnosis. The target condition for accuracy analyses was C or D. We constructed a 2 × 2 table and calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsOf 1,096 CT examinations during the study window, 233 were for suspected renal colic; 58 patients met eligibility and had admission CRP available (29 with CRP < 5 mg/L and 29 with CRP ≥ 5 mg/L). The target condition was present in 26/58 (44.8%). Using CRP ≥ 5 mg/L, sensitivity was 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.86), specificity 0.69 (0.51-0.82), positive predictive value 0.66 (0.47-0.80), negative predictive value 0.76 (0.58-0.88), likelihood ratio positive 2.34 (1.16-4.70) and likelihood ratio negative 0.39 (0.20-0.77).

conclusionCRP provided modest but clinically interpretable probability shifts for complicated stones or alternative acute pathology. A CRP first approach may support initial imaging selection between CTAP and CT KUB. Prospective multicentre validation is required.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsC-Reactive ProteinRenal ColicTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersContrast MediaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersContrast MediaC-Reactive ProteinC-reactive proteinCT abdomen and pelvisCT KUBDiagnostic accuracyRenal colicTriage

Identifiers

PMID41204018
PMCPMC12700957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.