ArticleEmergency radiology2025
"CRP-first" algorithm to guide imaging in suspected renal colic: a retrospective UK cohort study.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether admission C-reactive protein (CRP) can triage patients with suspected renal colic to low dose non contrast CT KUB or contrast enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) at first presentation.
methodsRetrospective single centre diagnostic accuracy study in a United Kingdom emergency department. Index test was admission CRP with a prespecified cut-off of 5 mg/L (positive if CRP ≥ 5 mg/L). Reference standard was CT classified a priori as: A normal, B simple calculus, C complicated calculus, D alternative acute diagnosis. The target condition for accuracy analyses was C or D. We constructed a 2 × 2 table and calculated sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsOf 1,096 CT examinations during the study window, 233 were for suspected renal colic; 58 patients met eligibility and had admission CRP available (29 with CRP < 5 mg/L and 29 with CRP ≥ 5 mg/L). The target condition was present in 26/58 (44.8%). Using CRP ≥ 5 mg/L, sensitivity was 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.86), specificity 0.69 (0.51-0.82), positive predictive value 0.66 (0.47-0.80), negative predictive value 0.76 (0.58-0.88), likelihood ratio positive 2.34 (1.16-4.70) and likelihood ratio negative 0.39 (0.20-0.77).
conclusionCRP provided modest but clinically interpretable probability shifts for complicated stones or alternative acute pathology. A CRP first approach may support initial imaging selection between CTAP and CT KUB. Prospective multicentre validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.