Trial reportEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
The efficacy of genetic counselling for familial colorectal cancer. A randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New year, new insights in genomic medicine.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic counselling (GC) for familial colorectal cancer (fCRC) has been previously shown to improve outcomes such as emotional distress and screening adherence. This is the first randomised clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of GC for fCRC. We included individuals affected or at-risk for fCRC (Lynch syndrome, APC-associated polyposis, other risk-associated pathogenic variants and clinically defined fCRC). Participants were randomised to (1) standard care or (2) standard care and genetic counselling. Measures include empowerment, anxiety, depression, knowledge, emotional distress, perceived social support, risk perception. Eighty-two individuals participated in the study. The average age was 44.81 years old, with 52.4% women. There was a significant effect in the counselling group (42/82) on post-intervention empowerment scores compared to the control group (40/82) (p = 0.004, d = 0.71), and similarly for depression (p = 0.025, d = 0.40), anxiety (p = 0.036, d = 0.35) and knowledge (p = 0.016, d = 0.25). Exploratory analysis show that several sociodemographic, affective and cognitive variables are moderating the improvement in empowerment following genetic counselling. Our data show significant improvements for both primary endpoint (empowerment) and secondary endpoints (knowledge, depression, anxiety, emotional distress). Genetic counselling is an effective intervention for fCRC both when the diagnosis is part of a syndrome or clinically defined, and both for affected or at-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.