ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Efficacy of venetoclax in the treatment of relapsed/refractory light-chain amyloidosis.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few studies have reported that venetoclax, a selective BCL2 inhibitor, has shown promising efficacy in relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis (RRAL), especially among patients harboring t(11;14). We retrospectively reviewed 29 RRAL patients treated with venetoclax between July 2022 and January 2025. Treatment was given for suboptimal prior response (45%), hematologic progression (38%), or rising involved free light chain not meeting progression criteria (17%). Venetoclax induced rapid and deep responses: 79% achieved very good partial response (VGPR) or complete response (CR), and 52% achieved stringent FLC response. High t(11;14) (> 10%) patients achieved ≥ VGPR in 91% versus 33% in low t(11;14) (p = 0.008). Cardiac responses occurred in 59% of evaluable patients. At a median follow-up of 19.7 months, one-year overall survival and event-free survival were 96.6% and 82.6%, respectively; two deaths were due to cardiac progression. Venetoclax was well tolerated, with mostly grade 1-2 adverse events, except one grade 3 leukopenia/neutropenia with grade 3 infection. These results support venetoclax as an effective and safe therapy for RRAL, particularly in t(11;14) patients, and highlight the need for prospective studies to refine patient selection and optimize treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.