ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Safety and risk factors of PICC insertion in hematologic malignancy patients with thrombocytopenia: a retrospective study.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for remission induction chemotherapy phase of acute leukemia: a single center experience in severely thrombocytopenic patients.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- A Novel Modified Ultrasound-Guided Venipuncture Technique for Non-Tunneled PICC Insertion in a Non-Operating Room Anesthesia (NORA) Setting: A Technical Report with Real-World Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Urgent ultrasound-guided dual-lumen PICC placement after platelet transfusion in severe aplastic anemia with extreme thrombocytopenia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hematology patients often have severe thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysfunction. Despite the risk of bleeding, PICC insertion is still needed to reduce chemotherapy-related adverse reactions. Currently, there are no definitive indicators for predicting whether PICC placement increases bleeding risk in these patients. Additionally, large-scale studies on the safety of PICC insertion in hematology-oncology patients with platelet counts ≤ 50 × 10⁹/L and/or coagulation abnormalities are lacking. To evaluate the safety of PICC insertion in hematological oncology patients with a platelet concentration ≤ 50 × 10⁹/L and/or coagulation dysfunction through a large-sample retrospective study and to identify risk factors for bleeding after PICC placement. We retrospectively analyzed 1511 hematological patients with a platelet count ≤ 50 × 10⁹/L who underwent PICC insertion from February 2017 to January 2020, focusing on risk factors for bleeding within 24 h post-insertion. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for bleeding within 24 h after PICC insertion as PT ≥ 13 s, platelet count ≤ 25 × 10⁹/L, and ADL score ≤ 95 points. Based on these three risk factors, patients were divided into low-risk (0-1 risk factors, 1% bleeding rate) and high-risk (≥ 2 risk factors, 7% bleeding rate) groups. When 0-1 risk factors are present, PICC insertion is safe even for patients with low platelet counts. If ≥ 2 risk factors exist, the decision to insert a PICC should consider the patient's clinical symptoms and needs. Blood product intervention does not affect the bleeding rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.