ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2026
Budget Impact Analysis of Implementing C-Reactive Protein Point-of-Care Testing to Aid Antibiotic Prescribing in Belgian Primary Care.
Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe inappropriate use of antibiotics is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and can lead to various adverse side effects. C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care testing (POCT) in primary care has shown potential as an effective strategy to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. This study evaluates the budget impact of introducing CRP POCT in Belgian primary care over a 5-year time horizon.
methodsA decision tree model was developed to compare the budget impact of implementing CRP POCT in primary care versus usual care (without CRP POCT) based on 712,102 acute cough patients annually. Cost and probability parameters were derived through literature review and primary data collection. The robustness of the findings was assessed using univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Additionally, alternative scenarios were explored by modifying key assumptions in the base-case scenario to evaluate the effect on the results.
resultsOver a 5-year period, implementing CRP POCT in Belgian primary care for the management of 712,102 acute cough patients annually is estimated to result in an incremental cost of approximately €12.8 million (95% credible interval: 12,699,459 to 12,924,898), primarily driven by capital expenditures for analysers and CRP test expenses. Scenario analyses showed substantial variation in budget impact depending on implementation choices, ranging from €13.6 million to €39.6 million, with the highest costs when general practitioners' (GPs') compensation was included. Reduced inappropriate antibiotic use, adverse side effects, and AMR rates would decrease costs, with these savings expected to grow over time as CRP POCT becomes more widely adopted. However, the proportion of these savings relative to total expenditure is limited.
conclusionThe implementation of CRP POCT entails a significant financial investment. Our scenario analyses indicate a substantial increase in budget impact when GPs' compensation was included. However, a well-designed implementation strategy with an appropriate GP compensation structure may be crucial to avoid inefficiencies from over- or underuse of CRP testing and achieve the anticipated health benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41203917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.