Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41203879›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Group membership and stereotype content jointly affect neural processing during resource allocation decisions.

Paloma Diaz-Gutierrez, Christophe Boone, Harshil G Vyas, Carolyn H Declerck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paloma Diaz-GutierrezFaculty of Business and Economics, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium. paloma.diazgutierrez@uantwerpen.be.
Christophe BooneFaculty of Business and Economics, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
Harshil G VyasFaculty of Business and Economics, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
Carolyn H DeclerckFaculty of Business and Economics, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

Flemish Scientific Research fund (FWO) #49101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both stereotypes and in/outgroup categories affect judgment and decision making, but while the former reflect socially learned generalizations about other people's characteristics, the latter specify relationships with whom it is safe to affiliate. With neuroimaging data we substantiate these distinct functions and explore how their underlying neural correlates interact to influence behavioral biases. Participants in the MRI scanner are asked to share money with recipients who are stereotyped along a warm/cold dimension and who belong either to a (minimally defined) in- or outgroup. Whole-brain univariate analyses reveal that colder stereotypes become increasingly salient when perceived groups, with heightened activity in amygdala, anterior insula, and ACC. Activation in the latter furthermore predicts decreased tendency to share with cold outgroup recipients, while rLPFC appears to mitigate this. ROI-based multivariate pattern analyses of the data indicate that, during early perceptual processing, only group membership is represented in the amygdala, while during decision making the orbitofrontal cortex represents both groups and stereotypes in such a way that outgroups amplify the dissimilarity between warm/cold traits. Together these results suggest that outgroups are a moderator of stereotypical reasoning with the potential to polarize, but that actual biased behavior depends on the individual's cognitive control.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingResource AllocationStereotypingAdultAmygdalaBrain MappingFemaleHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultAllocation decisionsfMRIGroupsStereotypes

Identifiers

PMID41203879
PMCPMC12594907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.