SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2026
Surgical treatment options and outcomes for concomitant treatment of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and male stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced genital reconstructive surgery: evolving techniques, expanding indications and future directions.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simultaneous stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are commonly caused by prostate surgery. Penile prosthesis is the gold standard for erectile dysfunction refractory to conservative therapies, fixed male sling and artificial urinary sphincter are recommended in mild and moderate/severe stress urinary incontinence respectively. The implantation of these devices can be simultaneous or delayed. This systematic review analyzes articles on simultaneous implantation of penile prosthesis and anti-incontinence devices. We search on Pubmed/Medline and Scopus: "penile prosthesis" AND "artificial urinary sphincter", "male sling", "Mini-Juppette", "ATOMS", "ProACT", "urethral bulking", "Advance", "Virtue". We have included 21 studies, mostly retrospective. The size of study cohorts is relatively small (2-65 patients) and the main cause of stress urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction was radical prostatectomy. The average operating time appeared longer (57-218 min), although without evidence of intraoperative complications and an average hospital stay of 1-3 days. The average follow up of the studies ranged from 1 month to 94 months. Studies expressed different outcomes measurements, that could not allow a cumulative analysis. The overall continence outcomes were encouraging, with social continence rates (no more than 1 pad/day) ranging from 72 to 100%. The overall satisfaction for the inflatable penile prosthesis was high (84-100%). The postoperative complication rate did not show an augmented risk for double implants. All studies did not report any technical or surgical implant obstacles in synchronous versus metachronous implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41203816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.